I came across the obituary for a Colonel Van Horn last week
while researching my uncle Benjamin Van Horn. On 3 January 1916, the Oakland
Trubune printed his obituary in form of an article on page nine. I skimmed over
it, not really expecting a connection until I read one line. One little line
that said, “Colonel Van Horn was the son of a Pennsylvania farmer of Dutch and
Scotch-Irish ancestry.” Who was his father?
Kansas
City , Mo. , Jan. 3. –
Colonel Robert Thompson Van Horn, founder of the Kansas City Journal and
pioneer journalist and statesman of the Middle west ,
died at his home here today. He was ninety-one years old. Death was due to the
infirmities of age.
Oakland Tribune. (Oakland , CA ),
3 January 1916.
His obituary reads:
Colonel Van Horn founded the Journal
and was for forty-one years editor of that paper, becoming a widely known
figure in American Journalism. Kansas
City was a village whose inhabitants numbered only 478
when the young Van Horn wnt there and bought the Weekly Enterprise for $500, in
1855, and changed the name to the Journal. With the rapid growth of the place
the Journal became one of the flourishing daily newspapers of the west. When
Colonel Van Horn retired from control of the paper, in 1896, he was seventy-two
years old. He was born May 19, 1824.
Son of Farmer
Colonel Van Horn was the son of a Pennsylvania farmer of
Dutch and Scotch-Irish ancestry. His education was largely of his own endeavor,
with occasional terms at a subscription school. At fifteen he became
apprenticed in the printing trade and worked at it for ten years in Pennsylvania , Indiana , Ohio and New York ,
finally drifting to Kansas City
to invest what little he had in the newspaper business for himself. As an editor
he made himself known as a fighter for the progress of Kansas
City and Missouri
and his whole career was interwoven with the history of that remarkable
progress.
Colonel Van Horn served in the public
not only as an editor, but as a soldier, as mayor of Kansas City many years ago, a member of the
State legislature and for four terms as the representative of his people in
Congress.
His military service was with the
Union Army, although in the political prologue to the Civil War he had been a
pro-slavery Democrat. Secession made a Union man and a Republican of him. He
headed a Missouri regiment which served with
distinction, participating in the battles of Shiloh, Corinth ,
and Westport .
While in the field with his regiment he was called to take a seat in the
Missouri Senate and shortly after the war he was sent to Congress. He
introduced there a bill for the organization of Oklahoma territory in 1868, and although the
territory was not established until twenty-five years later. It was Colonel Van
Horn who, for the first time, had introduced Congress to the now familiar name
of Oklahoma .
He disavowed credit for having coined
the name, but said that E. C. Boudinot, a Cherokee Indian, had told him it was
the Creek word meaning Redman’s land.
National Delegate
For many years Colonel Van Horn was a
delegate to Republican national conventions and was extremely proud of the fact
that he was one of “the immortal 306,” who stood for the third term nomination
of General Grant in the Chicago
convention of 1880.
One of Colonel Van Horn’s newspaper
reminiscences included the fact that his Journal on August 26, 1858, printed
the first article announcing the discovery of gold in Colorado . He also recalled the days when the
first telegraph news was received from St.
Louis over a wire completed as far as Boonville, from
which the news was forwarded by express.
In 1864 Colonel Van Horn married Miss
Adela H Cooley of Meige county, Ohio .
Four children were born to them, of whom Richard Van Horn, manager of the Van
Horn estate and a former newspaper man, is the only survivor. Mrs. Van Horn
died in July 1910. Since her death, Colonel Van Horn had spent most of his time
at Honeywood, on the outskirts of Kansas
City .
His obituary ran in the Oakland Tribune.
Sources:
Sunday’s Obituary is a genealogical prompt of GeneaBloggers.
© Jeanne Ruczhak-Eckman, 2016
Comments
Post a Comment